a mere mind and body. But all that is very vague. There is no clear distinction between mind and soul and none between mind and vital and often the vital is taken for the soul.Sri Aurobindo
Letters on Poetry and Art
CWSA 27
Fragment ID: 7131
(this fragment is largest or earliest found passage)
Sri Aurobindo — Unknown addressee
June 30, 1936
Plato [3]
In his book Plato, Taylor says that “the standing Academic definition of ‘man’ ” is “Soul using a body” and that “the soul is the man”.1 But it is not clear whether the soul is the mental being or something which uses the mind also.
The European mind, for the most part, has never been able to go beyond the formula of soul + body – usually including mind in soul and everything except body in mind. Some occultists make a distinction between spirit, soul and body. At the same time there must be some vague feeling that soul and mind are not quite the same thing, for there is the phrase “this man has no soul”, or “he is a soul” meaning he has something in him beyond a mere mind and body. But all that is very vague. There is no clear distinction between mind and soul and none between mind and vital and often the vital is taken for the soul.
30 June 1936
1 A.E. Taylor, Plato, The Man and His Work (London: Methuen, 1926), p. 27. Taylor bases his discussion on passages from Plato’s Alcibiades I and Euthydemus. – Ed.
Current publication:
[Largest or earliest found passage: ]
Sri Aurobindo. Letters on Poetry and Art // CWSA.- Volume 27.- Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 2004.- 769 p.
Other publications: