Sri Aurobindo
The Hour of God
and other writings
V. Essays Divine And Human
Towards Unification
The progress of distance-bridging inventions, our
modern facility for the multiplication of books and their copies and the
increase of human curiosity are rapidly converting humanity into a single
intellectual unit with a common fund of knowledge and ideas and a unified
culture. The process is far from complete, but the broad lines of the plan laid
down by the great Artificer of things already begin to appear. For a time this
unification was applied to Europe only. Asia had its own triune civilisation,
predominatingly spiritual, complex and meditative in India, predominatingly
vital, emotional, active and simplistic in the regions of the Hindu Kush and
Mesopotamia, predominatingly intellectual, mechanical and organised in the
Mongolian empires. East, West and South had their widely separate spirit and
traditions, but one basis of spirituality, common tendencies and such commerce
of art, ideas and information as the difficulties of communication allowed,
preserved the fundamental unity of Asia. East and West only met at their
portals, in war of kings than in peace, and through that shock and contact
influenced but did not mingle with each other. It was the discovery of Indian
philosophy and poetry which broke down the barrier. For the first time Europe
discovered something in the East which she could study not only with the
curiosity which she gave to Semitic and Mongolian ideas and origins, but with
sympathy and even with some feeling of identity. This meta- physics, these epics
and dramas, this formulated jurisprudence and complex society had methods and a
form which, in spite of their diversity from her own, yet presented strong
points of contact; she could recognise them, to a certain extent, she thought
she could understand. The speculativeness of the German, the lucidity of the
Gaul, the imagination and aesthetic emotionalism of the British Celt found
something to interest them, something even to assist. In the teachings of
Buddha, the speculation of Shankara, the poetry of Kalidasa, their souls could
find pasture and refreshment. The alien form
and spirit of Japanese and Arabian poetry and of Chinese philosophy which
prevented such an approximation with the rest of Asia was not here to interfere
with the comprehension of the human soul and substance. There was indeed a
single exception which was supplied by Japanese Art. The art of India
contradicted European notions too vitally to be admitted into the European
consciousness; its charm and power were concealed by the uncouthness to Western
eyes of its form and the strangeness of its motives. And it is only now, after
the greatest living art critics in England had published sympathetic
appreciations of Indian Art and energetic propagandists like Havell had
persevered in their labour, that the European vision is opening to the secret of
Indian painting and sculpture. But Japanese Art, though un-European in motives
and methods, yet presented to them a form and technique which they could
understand. Japanese painting had already begun to make its way into Europe even
before. The victories of Japan and its acceptance of much of the outward
circumstances of European civilisation opened a broad door into Europe for all
in Japan that Europe can receive without unease or the feeling of an
incompatible strangeness. Japanese painting, Japanese dress, Japanese decoration
are not only accepted as a part of Western life by the select few and the
cultured classes but known and allowed, without being adopted by the millions.
Asiatic civilisation has entered into Europe as definitely though not so
victoriously as European civilisation into Asia. It is only the beginning,
but\so was it only the beginning when a few scholars alone rejoiced in the
clarity of Buddhistic Nihilism, Schopenhauer rested his soul on the Upanishads
and Emerson steeped himself in the Gita. None could have imagined then that a
Hindu monk would make converts in London and Chicago or that a Vedantic temple
would be built in San Francisco and Anglo-Saxon Islamites erect a Mussalman
mosque in Liverpool. It appears from a recent inquiry that the only reading,
omitting works of fiction, which commands wide general interest among public
library readers is either scientific works or books replete with Asiatic
mysticism. How significant is this fact when we remember that these are the two
powers, Europe and Asia, the victorious intellect and the insurgent spirit
which are rising at this moment to struggle for the mastery of the
unified world! Nevertheless it is not the public library reader, the man in the
streets of the literary world, but the increasing circles of men of culture and
a various curiosity through which the Orient and the Occident must first meet in
a common humanity and the day dawn when some knowledge of the substance of the
Upanishads will be as necessary to an universal culture as a knowledge of the
substance of the Bible, Shankara's theories or the speculations of thinkers and
Kalidasa, Valmikie and Vyasa as near and common in the subject matter of the
European critical intellect as Dante or Homer.
It is the difficulties of presentation that prevent a more rapid and complete commingling....
(Incomplete)