Sri Aurobindo
Letters on Poetry and Art
SABCL - Volume 27
Part 2. On His Own and Others’ Poetry
Section 2. On Poets and Poetry
Poets of the Ashram
Some General Remarks [6]
Take this Poetry business. It has always been rare for me to write any poetry without a heavy dose of mental exercise. I have not, except once or twice, felt some force coming down and delivering a poem out of me, even a worthless one, in a second.... You yourself had to concentrate for 4 or 5 hours a day for so many years, after which everything flowed in a river. But I am not Sri Aurobindo! I am not born with such a will and determination.... Since I can’t spend so much labour, I have to conclude that such big things are not for me.
As there are several lamentations today besieging me, I
have very little time to deal with each separate Jeremiad. Do I understand
rightly that your contention is this,“I can’t believe in the Divine doing
everything for me because it is by my own mighty and often fruitless efforts
that I write or do not write poetry and have made myself into a poet”? Well,
that itself is épatant, magnificent, unheard of. It has always been
supposed since the infancy of the human race that while a verse-maker can be
made or self-made, a poet cannot. “Poeta nascitur non fit”, a poet is
born not made, is the dictum that has come down through the centuries and
millenniums and was thundered into my ears by the first pages of my Latin
Grammar. The facts of literary history seem to justify this stern saying. But
here in Pondicherry we have tried, not to manufacture poets, but to give them
birth, a spiritual, not a physical birth into the body. In a number of instances we are supposed to have succeeded — one of
these is your noble self — or if I am to believe the man of sorrows in you, your
abject, miserable, hopeless and ineffectual self. But how was it done? There are
two theories, it seems — one that it was by the Force, the other that it was
done by your own splashing, kicking, groaning Herculean efforts. Now, sir, if it
is the latter, if you have done that unprecedented thing, made yourself by your
own laborious strength into a poet (for your earlier efforts were only very
decent literary exercises), then, sir, why the deuce are you so abject,
self-depreciatory, miserable? Don’t say that it is only a poet who can produce
no more than a few poems in many months. Even to have done that, to have become
a poet at all, a self-made poet is a miracle over which one can only say Sabash!
Sabash! without ever stopping. If your effort could do that, what is there that
it can’t do? All miracles can be effected by it and a giant self-confident faith
ought to be in you. On the other hand if, as I aver, it is the Force that has
done it, what then can it not do? Here too faith, a giant faith is the only
logical conclusion. So either way there is room only for Hallelujahs, none for
Jeremiads. Q.E.D.
By the way what is this story about my four or five hours’ concentration a day for several years before anything came down? Such a thing never happened, if by concentration you mean laborious meditation. What I did was four or five hours a day pranayam — which is quite another matter. And what flow do you speak of? The flow of poetry came down while I was doing pranayam, not some years afterwards. If it is the flow of experiences, that did come after some years, but after I had stopped the Pranayam for a long time and was doing nothing and did not know what to do or where to turn once all my efforts had failed. And it came as a result not of years of Pranayam or concentration, but in a ridiculously easy way, by the grace either of a temporary guru (but it wasn’t that, for he was himself bewildered by it) or by the grace of the eternal Brahman and afterwards by the the grace of Mahakali and Krishna. So don’t try to turn me into an argument against the Divine; that attempt will be perfectly ineffective.
I am obliged to stop —
if I go on, there will be no Pranam till 12 o’clock. So send your Jeremiad back
tonight and I will see what else to write. Have written this in a headlong hurry
— I hope it is not full of lapsus calami.
I send you back the “Jeremiad”, Sir. My observations are reserved.
To continue. The fact that you don’t feel a force does
not prove that it is not there. The steam-engine does not feel a force moving
it, but the force is there. A man is not a steam-engine? He is very little
better, for he is conscious only of some bubbling on the surface which he calls
himself and is absolutely unconscious of all the subconscient, subliminal,
superconscient forces moving him. (This is a fact which is being more and more
established by modern psychology though it has got hold only of the lower forces
and not the higher, so you need not turn up your rational nose at it.) He
twitters intellectually (= foolishly) about the surface results and attributes
them all to his “noble self”, ignoring the fact that his noble self is hidden
far away from his own vision behind the veil of his dimly sparkling intellect
and the reeking fog of his vital feelings, emotions, impulses, sensations and
impressions. So your argument is utterly absurd and futile. Our aim is to bring
the secret forces out and unwalled into the open so that instead of getting some
shadows or lightnings of themselves out through the veil or being wholly
obstructed they may “pour down” and “flow in a river”. But to expect that all at
once is a presumptuous demand which shows an impatient ignorance and
inexperience. If they begin to trickle at first, that is sufficient to justify
the faith in a future downpour. You admit that you once or twice felt a “force
coming down and delivering a poem out of me” (your opinion about its worth or
worthlessness is not worth a cent, that is for others to pronounce). That is
sufficient to blow the rest of your Jeremiad into smithereens; it proves that
the force was and is there and at work and it is only your sweating Herculean
labour that prevents you feeling it. Also it is the trickle that gives assurance
of the possibility of the downpour. One has only to go on and by one’s patience
deserve the downpour or else, without deserving,
stick on till one gets it. In Yoga itself the experience that is a promise and
foretaste but gets shut off till the nature is ready for the fulfilment is a
phenomenon familiar to every Yogin when he looks back on his past experience.
Such were the brief visitations of Ananda you had some time before. It does not
matter if you have not a leechlike tenacity — leeches are not the only type of
Yogins. If you can stick anyhow or get stuck that is sufficient. The fact that
you are not Sri Aurobindo (who said you were?) is an inept irrelevance. One
needs only to be oneself in a reasonable way and shake off the hump when it is
there or allow it to be shaken off without clinging to it with a “leechlike
tenacity” worthy of a better cause.
All the rest is dreary stuff of the tamasic ego. As
there is a rajasic ego which shouts “What a magnificent powerful sublime divine
individual I am, unique and peerless” (of course there are gradations in the
pitch,) so there is a tamasic ego which squeaks “What an abject, hopeless,
worthless, incapable, unluckily unendowed and uniquely impossible creature I
am,— all, all are great, Aurobindos, Dilips, Anilkumars (great by an unequalled
capacity of novel-reading and self-content, according to you), but I, oh I, oh
I!” That’s your style. It is this tamasic ego (of course it expresses itself in
various ways at various times, I am only rendering your present pitch) which is
responsible for the Man of Sorrows getting in. It’s all bosh — stuff made up to
excuse the luxury of laziness, melancholy and despair. You are in that bog just
now because you have descended faithfully and completely into the inert
stupidity and die-in-the-mudness of your physical consciousness which, I admit,
is a specimen! But so after all is everybody’s, only there are different kinds
of specimens. What to do? Dig yourself out if you can; if you can’t, call for
ropes and wait till they come. If God knows what will happen when the Grace
descends, that is enough, isn’t it? That you don’t know is a fact which may be
baffling to your — well, your intelligence, but is not of great importance — any
more than your supposed unfitness. Who ever was fit, for that matter — fitness
and unfitness are only a way of speaking; man is unfit and a misfit (so far as things spiritual are concerned) — in his outward
nature. But within there is a soul and above there is Grace. “This is all you
know or need to know” and, if you don’t, well, even then you have at least
somehow stumbled into the path and have got to remain there till you get haled
along it far enough to wake up to the knowledge. Amen.
20–21 January 1936