Sri Aurobindo
Letters on Himself and the Ashram
The Complete Works of Sri Aurobindo. Volume 35
His Life and Attempts to Write about It
On His
Published Prose Writings
Passages from The Synthesis of Yoga [1]
“Often, we see this
desire of personal salvation overcome by another attraction which also belongs
to the higher turn of our nature and which indicates the essential character of
the action the liberated soul must pursue.... It is that which inspires a
remarkable passage in a letter of Swami Vivekananda. ‘I have lost all wish for
my salvation,’ wrote the great Vedantin, ‘may I be born again and again and
suffer thousands of miseries so that I may worship the only God that exists, the
only God I believe in, the sum-total of all souls,— and above all, my God the
wicked, my God the miserable, my God the poor of all races, of all species is
the special object of my worship. He who is the high and low, the saint and the
sinner, the god and the worm, Him worship, the visible, the knowable, the real,
the omnipresent; break all other idols. In whom there is neither past life nor
future birth, nor death nor going nor coming, in whom we always have been and
always will be one, Him worship; break all other idols.’
“The last two sentences contain indeed the whole gist of the {{0}}matter....”[[Sri Aurobindo, The Synthesis of Yoga, volume 23 of The Complete Works of Sri Aurobindo, pp. 269 –70.]]
As to the extract about Vivekananda, the point I make
there does not seem to me humanitarian. You will see that I emphasise there the
last sentences of the passage quoted from Vivekananda, not the words about God
the poor and sinner and criminal. The point is about the Divine in the World,
the All, sarva-bhūtāni of the Gita. That is not merely humanity, still
less only the poor or the wicked; surely even the rich or the good are part of
the All and those also who are neither good nor bad nor rich nor poor. Nor is
there any question (I mean in my own remarks) of philanthropic service; so
neither daridra nor sevā
is the point. I had formerly not the humanitarian but the humanity view — and
something of it may have stuck to my expressions in the Arya. But I had
already altered my viewpoint from the “Our Yoga for the sake of humanity” to
“Our Yoga for the sake of the Divine”. The Divine includes not only the
supracosmic but the cosmic and the individual —
not only Nirvana or the Beyond but Life and the All. It is that I stress
everywhere. But I shall keep the extracts for a day or two and see what there
is, if anything, that smacks too much of a too narrow humanistic standpoint. I
stop here for today.
29 December 1934