Sri Aurobindo
Letters on Himself and the Ashram
The Complete Works of Sri Aurobindo. Volume 35
Remarks on Public Figures in India
Subhas Chandra Bose [10]
In all this imbroglio about the book on {{0}}Subhas[[The Subhash I Knew, by Dilip Kumar Roy (Bombay, Nalanda Publications, 1946).]] one thing is positive that I never gave any such order and it ought to have been evident to everybody that I could not have done it since I permitted the publication of your book and the prohibition of it would have been too outrageous a self-contradiction to be even thinkable....
Behind all that is an old story which may account for
everything. You will remember that both the Mother and I were very angry against
Subhas for having brought the Japanese into India and reproached him with it as
a treason and crime against the Motherland. For if they had got in, it would
have been almost impossible to get them out. The Mother knows the Japanese
nation well and was positive about that. Okawa, the leader of the Black Dragon
(the one who shammed mad and got off at the Tokyo trial) told her that if India
revolted against the British, Japan would send her Navy to help, but he said
that he would not like the Japanese to land because if they once got hold of
Indian soil they would never leave it, and it was true enough. If the Japanese
had overrun India, and they would have done it if a powerful Divine intervention
had not prevented it and turned the tables on them, they would have joined the
Germans in Mesopotamia and the Caucasus and nothing could have saved Europe and
Asia from being overrun. This would have meant the destruction of our work and a
horrible fate for this country and for the world. You can understand therefore
the bitterness of our feelings at that time against Subhas and his association
with the Axis and the disaster to his country for which he would have 
been responsible. Incidentally, instead of being liberated in 1948,
India would have had to spend a century or several centuries in a renewed
servitude. When therefore the Mother heard that you were writing a book
eulogising Subhas, she disapproved strongly of any such thing issuing out of the
Ashram and she wanted that you should be asked not to publish it....
... Subsequently she met one of the chief lieutenants of Subhas, a man from Hyderabad who had been his secretary and companion in the submarine by which he came from Germany to Japan, and he recounted his daily talks in the submarine and strongly defended his action. From what he said it was evident although we still regarded Subhas’s action as a reckless and dangerous folly, that the aspect of a crime against the country disappeared from it. Since then Mother modified her attitude towards Subhas; moreover, the war was receding into the past and there was no longer any room for the poignancy of the feeling it had raised and it was better that all that should be forgotten. But although almost a year had passed, the impressions made at that time have remained in the minds of many and account for the attitude of X and Y to your book and must also be the psychological source of X’s misunderstanding about the supposed order.
We regret that a blow should have fallen on you and the pain accompanying it when no blow was really given or intended. Anyhow, the matter has been rectified; the library has been informed that there has been a misunderstanding, no prohibition was actually made and the book must be issued to sadhaks.
5 April 1947