SITE OF SRI AUROBINDO & THE MOTHER
      
Home Page | Followers and Disciples | Workings by Nirodbaran | Talks with Sri Aurobindo

Nirodbaran

Talks with Sri Aurobindo


Volume 1

10 December 1938 – 14 January 1941

20 November 1939

Nirodbaran: I have a few more questions on yesterday’s topic. First, it seems that so long as love can be kept more or less psychic and mental it tends to remain high, noble and constant. But if it is brought down to the physical it tends to be vitiated and gets lost. So the physical relation seems to be predominantly responsible for the breaking of the union.

Sri Aurobindo: The vital can also be responsible for it without any physical element. You can’t say the physical is predominantly so. Blake and others actually say that spiritual love should be sanctified by vital and physical action. They are part of divine love.

Nirodbaran: In woman, people say, a moment comes when she surrenders everything to the beloved. The physical being is a part of that surrender.

Sri Aurobindo: That is the attitude of submission of the female to the male. Real surrender is a different thing, more psychic in character.

Nirodbaran: In a psychic relation, when sex action takes place, is it only for procreation?

Sri Aurobindo: The psychic element may be extended into the physical.

Nirodbaran: But is there not a danger of the psychic element being lost?

Sri Aurobindo: That depends on the strength of the psychic. The psychic relation is itself very rare, but it can get overclouded.

Nirodbaran: If a person has been disappointed in love in the world and that element is not satisfied, and after turning to the Divine he finds somebody whom he loves and adores, can it be called a need or necessity of the being?

Sri Aurobindo: Not need or necessity. All depends on the particular case. If there is the psychic element in it, it can help. The Vaishnavas brought even sexual relations into their Yoga in order to sublimate them. The result in their case was a failure.

Nirodbaran: But in spite of the psychic element, there is a risk. The “thing” may be lost.

Sri Aurobindo: I don’t know what this “thing” is as I don’t know the case.

Satyendra: Nirod is speaking very guardedly!